On 19.04.2007 07:14, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:10 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.04.2007 23:05, Brian Pepple wrote:
>
/topic FESCO-Meeting -- MISC -- Vote on rebuilding packages with old
disttag - jwb
Something related to this (mentioned on FAB-list 24 hours ago, but
didn't get any replies) to fix the problem in F8 and later:
Why don't we just expand the disttag to something else without the
"fc<I>n</I>" in it in the devel branch? Then we don't have run into the
"package disttag doesn't match the release it is shipped in" problem
when a package is not rebuild during a devel cycle. A simple ".1" maybe
-- that should make everybody happy afaics:
How would a mixture of .1 and .fc6 in the released fc7 make everybody
happier than a mixture of .1 and .fc7 ?
"to fix the problem in F8 and later" -- IOW: I think this change should
be done after F7 was branched, to make this problem go away over time.
For FC7 I think it's far to late for changes like this or mass-rebuilds
to get rid of the fc6 in the devel branch.
Or does the proposal include a
mass rebuild on day zero to replace all .1 by .fc7 ?
You mean rebuild everything in devel after F7 is out? Could be done if
we want to, but I suppose its not worth the trouble: the problem will
vanish on it's own mostly by F8; maybe we'll do a mass rebuild for F8
anyway if the toolchain should change.
OIOW: I'd say we simply change to what the distttag expands right after
F7 was branched, and then look at the repos by F8-test1 or test2 and
decide then what to do.
CU
thl
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
