Hi!
On 18.04.2007 01:33, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
* The guidelines contained a few references to fedora-extras-list;
these have been altered to point to fedora-devel-list instead.
We went ahead and made the change because extras-list is gone, but
FESCO should ack these changes.
Well, some people accuse me of formalizing everything to much and
putting to much government structures into Fedora (they might have a
point, but that's another discussion). But reading the above I'm
starting myself to wonder: does FESCo really want and have to look at
such issue like adjusting references to fedora-extras-list? Sending the
adjustments that are going to be made to the list (where FESCo members
as well as ordinary packagers can jump in if they don't like something)
and discussing them in FPC IMHO should be more than enough I'd say.
* Meeting time: We'll have to block out time in a wiki table and try
to narrow something down. At the moment it looks like 1600UTC
satisfies the most people, except for cutting into f13's lunchtime.
BTW, it's not my business as I'm not in the FPC, but I thought I mention
it here as I'm writing this mail anyway already: most meetings times
seems to take the DST switch into account and adjust the UTC meeting
time by an hour so the effective time always stays round about (¹) the
same for US and Europe. Wouldn't that be a solution for the FPC, too?
Just my 2 cent.
CU
thl
(¹) -- the switches are on different dates these days, so there are two
or three weeks where it's getting a bit mor complicated :-/
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
