Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Meeting minutes and full logs of the packaging meeting which occurred on 2007.04.17 are online: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20070417 Executive summary: The following drafts are now official guidelines, having been accepted by FESCO last week: * A statement of the responsibilities of reviewers and packagers during the package review process http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OverallReviewGoals * Guidelines for conflicting packages and the use of Conflicts: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts These should be written into the guidelines soon if this hasn't already been done by the time you read this. Issues pending FESCO ratification: * Minor clarifications to the filename encoding guidelines: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-April/msg00156.html * The guidelines contained a few references to fedora-extras-list; these have been altered to point to fedora-devel-list instead. We went ahead and made the change because extras-list is gone, but FESCO should ack these changes.
Can you remove all references to core and extras from the guidelines? FESCo is Fedora Engineering Steering Committee now.
Rahul -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
