On 17.04.2007 13:05, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
And it comes as no suprise since as we all should know FE was always
doing mass rebuilds until including FC6. I wonder how the 0.6% and 1%
were forgotten in the process. Perhaps someone did a rebuild with the
same EVR - we didn't catch these in the old days.
We never did full rebuilds. Data-packages never had to be rebuild.
OK, that accounts for the 0.6-1% then. [...]
Well, you carefully didn't reply to the part where I explained that you
can't get to a proper number "how many packages weren't rebuild in the
devel cycle FE5 -> FE6" by looking at todays repos. So the 0.6-1% are
FUD in my eyes.
I don't have hard numbers either -- but from memory I'd say we didn't
rebuild round about 1/3 of the packages in the FE mass rebuild for FC6.
Some of those not rebuild received updates earlier or later in the devel
cycle. So if I should guess I'd say the number of packages that didn't
get rebuild between FE5 and FE6 was somewhere between 7.5 and 25
percent. Maybe Ville has more data, he did a lot of work back then for
the mass rebuild.
CU
thl
/me will try to resist from this thread now, this doesn't lead to anything
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
