On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 10:50 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday 10 April 2007 10:19, Tomas Janousek wrote: > > > As a paying RHEL customer, this kind of upsets me. They can't take > > > the time to ensure file-names are right on their flagship product. I > > > > The file names ARE right. > > I would disagree. If I were a paying customer, I would expect all package > names to match. If nothing else, it makes you feel like the toolchain that is > in RHEL actually did something with the package in case you have to rebuild > it yourself at some point. It also makes you feel that somebody actually > spent a couple of minutes with it. > > I can also envision somebody asking an admin why they put FC6 files on their > installation and how that affects support. Even though there is a KB article, > they still have go look for it and have to prove it to other people. That is > really a needless exercise. Please take this to a rhel list. please. -sv -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
