Jesse Keating schrieb:
On Friday 30 March 2007 10:33:30 Matthias Saou wrote:
I don't see any mention of a "mass rebuild" like it was previously
done with Extras. Is this something we will no longer be doing?
I'd like to do this only for technical reasons such as compiler changes or
breaking inheritance from previous releases.
Just wondering: Do we care about packages currently in devel which still
have the fc6 dist tag?
$ lftp -c "open \
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/linux/extras/development/i386/;\
ls; quit" | grep '.fc6.' | wc -l
1330
I think it's a *bit* confusing to have a F7 tree later with lots of
packages which have a fc6 in the filename... Maybe we should have
something in the package guidelines that says "if you use a dist tag
then you should try to rebuild the package once during a development
cycle so the disttag matches the actually release."
But as I said, it's just a detail.
I'd rather see other
non-intrusive methods for finding awol maintainers.
Agreed. Anyway, if we haven't anything in place to find AWOL maintainers
by F8T2 then my vote is to have a mass rebuild shorty after that again
(but we might have new toolchain by then anyway that would make a
rebuild likely).
CU
thl
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
