On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:32:38 +0100, Tomas Janousek wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > You compare a dist tag with a minor release number, which breaks the > > entire scheme. RPM doesn't see any decimal point. It compares 4 with > > 4 and 1 with fc6. Same applies to > > What scheme does it break? The goal of the %dist tag. Using a %dist tag forces you into a specific versioning scheme that doesn't violate the upgrade path between dists. On one hand, you acknowledge that. On the other hand, you advocate your own incompatible versioning scheme. > > 4.0 > 4.fc6 > > 4.0 > 4.Gold > > 4.0 > 4.a > > 4.0 > 4. That's all, it works. If I said "first compare the numbers, 4.0 > 4 is string comparison, not comparison of numbers. > than the > crap after them", it'd be true in these cases, even if that's not the way it's > done internally. > > Seems like I really don't see your point. Then we share something, since I don't see any point in your destructive replies at all. I'm starting to regret that I've posted the original message to this list. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
