Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm schrieb:
> 
> The way I see it it is like the following:
> [...]

The way it was meant was the following afaics and iirc:

 * fedora-maintainers -- important discussions between maintainers where
we exclude the world (remember: it's a closed list!), no endless
flamewars, not that much traffic, so people can easily follow it

 * fedora-devel -- all the other devel stuff

I'd say we failed with what fedora-maintainers was meant for. We have
quite some flamewars on fedora-maintainers, we discussed stuff here that
we should have discussed in the open on fedora-devel-list, where
non-contributors can participate, it's high traffic and we scared people
away with it.

CU
thl

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux