On 20.03.2007 13:59, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 05:06:50 David Woodhouse wrote: >> The kernel and glibc are already built for ppc64. There is no need to >> queue a rebuild just to get ppc64 versions of those. >> Everything we want to ship for ppc64 is already built, surely? Except >> perhaps blt > And when we want to _rebuild_ them after we merge core and extras? ppc64 has > to be turned on if you want that rebuild to succeed. To be turned on, it has > to be turned on for every package, and unless somebody goes through and > bootstraps Extras into ppc64, builds will be failing left and right because > there are no packages to build against. Maybe we can handle PPC64 as our first "secondary arch testbed"? E.g. enable ppc64 everywhere, but having a package that fails to build on ppc64 would not block the rebuild package to enter the i386, x86_64 and ppc repos. Or does support for this not exists yet in Koji? Then this might be a bad idea... CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
