On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 19:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:48:52PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > Okay this whole line of thought is total crackrock. Why do we need to > > make value judgements over what packages deserve a fixed ID, and what > > doesn't? If we're going to do fixed IDs at all, there's *no* reason we > > Because there's no important reason to have a fixed UID if no files are > owned. Other than reducing the number of dynamically assigned IDs out in the wild that can bite us in the ass in the future. We can't eliminate dynamic IDs, but I believe minimizing their usage is in our best interests.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
