Re: RFC: Signed JAR Packaging Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> But any random JVM that a user downloads from Sun or IBM directly 
> wouldn't know about this extra endorsement, right? So any 
> non-rpm-installed JVMs would still not work?

They would work fine for whatever they were installed for. They just
wouldn't work for this. Presuming that "this" can be made to work just fine
with gcj and/or future-free-java, then it should just stay that way. Am I
not getting something? 

I mean, do we consider "the kernel doesn't build with Microsoft C" a
problem?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux