On Monday 12 March 2007 17:02:06 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:57:45PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > > Why this is bad? > > It still is not fully reproducible in a sense that other people can't > > take our source, modify it slightly, and make a Sun-blessed JSS JAR. > > I'm really against it. At the very least, it screws over CentOS. This a bad > path to be going down. > > I'd much prefer gcj and the future Fedora-shipped implementation of the Sun > JVM to make it easy to use self-generated certificates. If someone wants to > install a proprietary JVM, let's make _that_ the hard case. I agree. How much fun would it be if apache suddenly decided to not function with self signed certs and any cert you used had to come from verasign ? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpqmAtNqERFS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
