Le lundi 12 mars 2007 à 17:29 -0400, Simo Sorce a écrit : > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 16:33 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > > The problem is SUN controls the default certificate list in jvms, and > > > it's reinitialised every time you update a vendor jvm, so in practical > > > terms only SUN-approved keys "just work" > > > > > > > This might have interesting consequences for Sun's plans to GPLv3 their > > Java. > > Why? > Is their own signature required for the package to work, and nothing > else will work even if rebuilt from scratch? commercial jvms will barf if a crypto package is not signed with a SUN-approved certificate -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
