Re: RFC: Signed JAR Packaging Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 16:33 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > 
> > The problem is SUN controls the default certificate list in jvms, and
> > it's reinitialised every time you update a vendor jvm, so in practical
> > terms only SUN-approved keys "just work"
> > 
> 
> This might have interesting consequences for Sun's plans to GPLv3 their 
> Java.

Why?
Is their own signature required for the package to work, and nothing
else will work even if rebuilt from scratch?

Simo.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux