On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:11:13PM +1000, Jens Petersen wrote: > rpmlint currently marks obsoletes without provides as errors in its > output. However some obsoletes are really just a convenience for > upgrades, etc. For example scim obsoletes some old iiimf packages but > it surely does not provide iiimf. > The scim package has versioned obsoletes, and I do not think that it > should provide the obsoleted iiimf packages. > Should rpmlint be updated to only warn about versioned obsoletes without > provides? I think it's a reasonable warning -- not all warnings are errors. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
