Re: Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> > Since we can't count it, it needs to be weighted on a case by case
> > basis.
> 
> Why not use 'fedora-usermgmt'?

Argh, you removed the context. Because fedora-usermgmt can't solve the
issue of fixed uid? And because the smei-static, but almost always
random method of fedora-usermgmt would be of no help?

Either it makes sense for a package to have a fixed uid/gid or
not. There is nothing in between, and all fedora-usermgmt does is ship
the packages as random uid allocating pushing any possible problem
with needed fixed uids to the users.

And please don't start again with predictable vs fixed uid. If an
admin really wants a "predictable" uid on his systems for daemon foo
he can useradd -u 666 foo before installing a the package.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpiZ7Dz681Ot.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux