Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:17:40 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The user can set PREFERRED_EMACS to x or nox or kde or wx or whatever
> interfaces the future GNU emacs supports.  If its installed on this
> system, it'll be invoked, else the script falls back to looking for an
> emacs to run.
>
> If there were a multitude of options, you could even set your own
> fallback order.

And people have complained about /etc/alternatives as being "unclean"
somehow?

What possible benefit is there to re-inventing all of its
functionality on a package-by-package basis like this?

-Carl

Attachment: pgp47R9qTviSi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux