Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:53:42PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:53 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:33:45PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > 
> > > Which isn't, as I said, very convincing. They're not running as root, and
> > > they're not installed setuid, they need to don't do wacky things with memory
> > > and hardware access, etc. -- in short, they don't fall under the basic
> > > reasons for wanting to avoid installing X. They're just some more libraries,
> > > nothing special to worry about.
> > 
> > They are unusefull code lying around which is better avoided when
> > possible. Less code installed less issues to worry about.
> 
> It amazes me that people can say things like this with a straight face
> when talking about an editor with a built-in Eliza.

;-)

--
Pat

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux