On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:50:57PM -0500, John Dennis wrote: > There is nothing wrong with rpmlint, it is properly complaining about > two packages which both claim to own the same file, that's a conflict > and we don't want conflicts. It's not a conflict if the file is identical. > To get us to a situation where there can be two versions of emacs (a > reasonable goal) we have the following choices: > * have a package which owns /usr/bin/emacs and install a script to start > the preferred version. emacs and emacs-nox both require this package. What, like, say, "emacs-common"? > I think the first solution is preferable, a master package, plus there > are many files in emacs which would be shared between X version and the > nox version, these can all go in the master package. Revolutionary! :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
