On Friday 09 March 2007 12:56:01 Chip Coldwell wrote: > I really don't understand the reaction alternatives is getting. Is it > really preferable to have every package create its own script, using its > own environment variables and its own priorities, than to use a common > infracstructure like alternatives? At least once the SA has learned > alternatives, he knows what to expect from the different packages that use > it. Forgive my ignorance, but isn't alternatives a sitewide thing, where preference for emacs vs emacs-nox might be a per user thing? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpWLszERMvqy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
