Jesse Keating writes: > On Friday 09 March 2007 12:27:11 Chip Coldwell wrote: > > Then I suggested dropping the emacs-nox package. > > > > That met with strenous objections. > > Where? I saw one objection. > > You could also keep the emacs-nox package and just name it emacs-nox. If > you're purposefully setting up a box without X libs and with emacs-nox, you > probably are capable of running emacs-nox instead of 'emacs'. Huh? How would you even know it was there? You may not have setp up the box yourself, you may not even have used a Red Hat box before. Andrew. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
