Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> obviously you need an emacs-gnome subpackage that introduces the gnome 
> capabilities, while the emacs main package provides you with emacs, without 
> gnome.  This may take significant upstream work, but so be it.

It's not GNOME, per se, but it uses gtk as the widget set for the
menus and (IIRC) pango as the text renderer, as opposed to the obsolete Xaw
widgets & core fonts.

Now, what I wonder is:

GUI:

notting   8220 22.5  0.9  39952 14228 pts/5    S    16:39   0:00 emacs

GUI with -nw:

notting   8089  0.1  0.4  36112  7244 pts/4    S+   16:35   0:00 emacs -nw

-nox:

notting   8042  0.1  0.3   9644  5816 pts/2    S+   16:35   0:00 emacs-nox

Some of the additional memory usage is shared, of course, but it's a
neat trick that the supposedly equivalent -nw version uses four times
the memory. Of course, the binary is also 4x the size, so that may
make sense.

FWIW, I'm of the opinion that no one should be using alternatives unless
they absolutely have to, so I'd prefer the wrapper approach.

Bill

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux