On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 12:11 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:47:18PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > How exactly do you propose packages should install anything under /usr > > if its readonlyness is so sacrosanct ? Does it at least occur to you > > that it cannot be readonly at install time ? > > Please don't be so literate, we already looped twice around the world > explaining this. If you read it letter by letter and ignore FHS' > intentions you may indeed logically conclude that /usr would be an > empty filesystem, but try reading the full context. > > The bottom line is: Don't %config/%config(noreplace) files under /usr. 1. When will you finally understand that rpm's %config has nothing to do with configurating a system. %config only specifies rpm's behavior upon handling of backups upon install. 2. When a file-system is read-only, rpm can neither install the files, nor create backups => The fact a file is marked %config is completely irrelevant. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
