On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 08:00 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 02.03.2007 07:35, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:19 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 01.03.2007 18:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>>> like to avoid). The FESCo pages would be moved to FESCo/ maybe. > >>> What is the opinion of the Packaging Committee and others on this move? > >> No idea, they should all be on this list, so they hopefully speak up. > > IMO, these package do not belong into a "FPC owned" Packaging directories. > > > > "official FPC" and "community contributed pages" should be strictly > > separated. Whether "Packaging" should be "FPC owned/controlled" is > > different question. > > Yes -- the stuff from the PC could be moved to the Packaging/Guidelines/ > and the organizational stuff (meeting schedule, guidelines drafts) could > be under FPC/ or PackagingCommittee/ (and that from FESCo below FESCo/ > That's one option. To me, the current Extras front page has six sections of which one is for end-users and the other five are for contributors. The end-user one should be merged into the front-page/rest of the site just as Extras and Core repositories are being merged. The contributor pages could replace /Packaging as you suggest or into /Contributors /Developers etc. I can see the organizational view you want to build looking something like this: / == All of Fedora /Ambassadors /Marketing /Packaging /AdminRequests /DraftGuidelines /FESCo /Guidelines /PackagingCommittee /Policy It makes logical sense. But it does mean we have to make a lot of changes to links on every page. I don't see it as being a huge amount more work to move /Packaging => /Guidelines compared to /Extras => /Packaging, though. So I'll go along with anything as long as the Guidelines continue to exist in a non-user editable location. (Although streamlining the creation, submission, revising, and approval of new guidelines from non-committee folks would be nice. /PackagingDrafts is a start but it doesn't go far enough.) -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
