On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:19 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 01.03.2007 18:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 01.03.2007 00:29, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> Brian Pepple wrote: > >>>> /topic FESCo meeting -- Free discussion around Fedora Extras > >>> It might be more appropriate now to change this in "Free discussions > >>> around Fedora" instead. > >> This reminds me: A lot of pages in the wiki are still in the Extras/ > >> Namespace. Do we want to ignore that for now or shall we move the files > >> somewhere else? And remove all references to Extras while at it? > >> My vote is to move them to Packaging/, as most of the pages are about > >> packaging, so thatÄs the obvious place for it -- but that needs > >> coordination with the Packaging Committee, as they use Packaging/ > >> currently (and have restrictive ACLs, which afaics most people would > >> like to avoid). The FESCo pages would be moved to FESCo/ maybe. > > What is the opinion of the Packaging Committee and others on this move? > > No idea, they should all be on this list, so they hopefully speak up. IMO, these package do not belong into a "FPC owned" Packaging directories. "official FPC" and "community contributed packages" should be strictly separated. Whether "Packaging" should be "FPC owned/controlled" is different question. I for own would recommend to change as little as possible, because Fedora already has openedn way to many "construction sites" and we really don't need more. So, a minimalist approach would seem more appropriate to me: Either * do nothing and keep things as they are. * Rename "Extras/" into something more meaningful. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
