On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 13:55 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:06:31PM +0100, Laurent Rineau wrote: > > > > In an ideal word, I would have preferred that any configuration file that has > > a meaning in a site-wise configuration exists in both /etc/ and /usr. > > And there should be a third configuration file which would contain the > vendor/packager/upstream defaults, which would change on updates without > breaking users config and sometimes be necessary to have the software > still working correctly. In practice, such concepts don't work, because each party involved into integrating a package into a system, thinks in different categories based on their (necessarily limited) personal background. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
