Laurent Rineau wrote:
I really what a discussion. You may convince me and Ralf. But give good
reasons. AS far as I understand, the FSH does not state that sitewise config
files cannot be in /usr, and as far as I understand, the FSH states that
sitewise config could not be in /etc (be cause /etc is host specific).
What is wrong with my interpretation?
I believe that site-wide configuration files may be kept under /usr and
that this falls within the description of /usr in the FHS. However, as
packagers we do not know if admins using our packages will be wanting to
configure them on a host-by-host basis or a site-wide basis. Since it's
likely that at least some admins are going to want to configure packages
on a host-by-host basis, does it not follow that packages should *not*
place configuration files under /usr, at least unless such configuration
can be overridden by another configuration file elsewhere such as in /etc?
Paul.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
