Re: Future owners/ACL choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:39:29 +0200
ville.skytta@xxxxxx (Ville Skyttä) wrote:

> On Monday 26 February 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:00:43 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Yeah, there needs to be periodic 'culling' of the orphans.
> > > If they haven't been picked up in a while (how long?) they should
> > > get:
> > >
> > > - removed from the repository (all branches?)
> >
> > Of course! All branches! Else it creates broken upgrades and bug
> > reports that go to "orphan owner".
> 
> That's only a partial solution, it won't help people who installed it
> while it was available which is very confusing.  IMO that'd make it a
> no go; instead either
> 
> 1) Never remove orphaned packages from non-devel distros only because
> they're orphaned, and do document whatever there is to document about
> them in the next release notes (at least a list with a caveat that it
> is possible that some of them will reappear later and thus the
> accuracy of the information is likely to decrease as time passes from
> the release date), or

The downside here, as Michael mentioned is that users will then file
bugs and it will go to the orphan alias and be ignored, or if we remove
the bugzilla component entirely, they won't even be able to file a bug
at all. No one will be watching the package for security issues most
likely either. ;( 

> 2) Arrange a way to have the orphaned packages removed or at least
> suggested to be removed from end user systems at the time they
> disappear from repositories.  Far from nice in the first place, and
> possibly a PITA if one has local/3rd party packages that have
> dependencies to removed stuff.

Yeah, could be that would cause problems, but I wonder if it's worth
trying... 

create a 'fedora-orphans' package. When things are orphaned, that
package gets added to it: 
Provides: oldpackagename = $provEVR 
Obsoletes: oldpackagename < $obsEVR

If the package is unorphaned, just bump release and it's back in
business. I do suspect this will make some mad users if they use other
repos or locally built packages however. 

Just a thought... 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux