On Tuesday 27 February 2007 18:50, Axel Thimm wrote: > koji is after replacing plaque. Is that that plan decided on already, > or are there opponents to koji? That was the plan as decided at the Fedora Summit. > If the replacement is already decided > on, when should that happen? As soon as we can do it cleanly. > In the wiki there is a delivery target of > F7test3 (in 4 weeks), do we really want to swap buildsystems shortly > before a release? Given that Test3 is the Feature Freeze, and we've created a Test4 after that, and that both koji and plague use mock as the building tool, yes I feel confident switching them at this point. Getting koji in place is a precursor to merging all the packages. > If we commit to koji and it slips the whole release > slips even further, and we get back PR on this already. I'm of the opinion that if we can't meet the Test3 deadline for koji, we may do a release without the merger, still composing out of the two package collections and target F8 for the merger. This is just me thinking outload, no official statement or anything. > And will the change affect packagers in their common workflow? E.g. I > can imagine a rather transparent change, with make build someday > silently (but pre-announced) update itself into calling koji > components instead of plaque. That's the plan. Adding new packages may be an extra step or two for the cvsadmin for a bit, but 'make tag, make build' should all do the same things. You'll gain a lot more functionality out of the build system but you can completely ignore it if you want. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp6RmcabXzPn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
