On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 20:33 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 20:35 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Samstag 24 Februar 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > > Maintainer requesting ownership of an owned package => request is queued > > > > When is there a need for a maintainer to get ownership of another package > > without wanting the original owner to transfer it? The only case I can think > > of is when the actual owner of a package is AWOL. But in this case it should > > be made sure that all of his packages are taken care of, so that the correct > > workflow should be a request to orphan all packages of a maintainer and then > > pick the package one wants to adopt. > > There could be other instances as well. If Dave Jones were to go AWOL, > for instance, and he had no comaintainers, we'd certainly want to fast > track someone onto the kernel package no matter what the state of his > other packages. Bad example. Dave has a GPS unit embedded into him that the Fedora Orbital Laser is constantly tracking. He can't go AWOL, or he and everyone within 5 km of him will be incinerated. Oh wait... I wasn't supposed to say that. MUAHAHAHAHHA josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
