Re: Future owners/ACL choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Samstag 24 Februar 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> Maintainer requesting ownership of an owned package => request is queued

When is there a need for a maintainer to get ownership of another package 
without wanting the original owner to transfer it? The only case I can think 
of is when the actual owner of a package is AWOL. But in this case it should 
be made sure that all of his packages are taken care of, so that the correct 
workflow should be a request to orphan all packages of a maintainer and then 
pick the package one wants to adopt.
What may be useful, would be to queue the request for the owner of the 
regarding package, so that a maintainer can ask another maintainer via the 
packageDB for a package and then it is transfered.

> Maintainer transfer => Present owner should be able to reassign to a new
> owner within cvsextras.

I think that this transfer should be acknowleged by the new owner before it 
takes place, to make sure it is wanted by both sides.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: pgpxGyEy4GNIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux