On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 12:05 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I like this. Orphaned packages could default back to open for any Extras > > contributor. > > What I'm concerned about here is what to do with orphaned packages > from a repository standpoint - should they be removed? Should > builds go to some sort of limbo? > > I'm mostly of the opinion that they shouldn't be kept limping indefinitely > without an *actual* owner. Check how FE has handled this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/AWOL_Maintainers I don't see why this should not be applicable in future. One problem however: The ACLs prevent volunteers from stepping in and to take over rsp. to remove a package. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
