Re: Future owners/ACL choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

TK> I think we should allow members of cvsextras to take and release
TK> ownership at will. notting would rather see requests get queued
TK> (at least, requests to take ownership) and a cvs admin will
TK> approve it.

After some thought I believe that people should be able to relinquish
ownership at will (since they can do that anyway just by not
maintaining their packages any longer) and that anyone should be able
to take ownership of orphaned packages at will.  Maintainers should be
able to give ownership of their packages to others (either adding
other maintainers or completely transferring ownership to others).
But I see no problem with restricting the ability to arbitrarily take
ownership of another already owned package.

 - J<

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux