On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Warren Togami wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Monday 19 February 2007, Warren Togami wrote: > >> More Branches on Existing Packages > >> ================================== > >> 1) Use existing review ticket, even if it is CLOSED, this is fine. > > > > Reusing an old review ticket results in additional traffic on the reviews > > mailing list that most recipients probably don't care about and would > > rather not receive... > > Somebody asking to change the owner of a package shouldn't be visible to > everyone else? I believe it should. I believe so too [0], but that's not what I replied to. See above, the reply was to the chapter titled "More Branches on Existing Packages". IMO there's little reason to notify everyone on fedora-package-review about additional branch requests done later (probably 2 mails per request as the flag gets toggled between states). [0] OTOH, I'm not sure about the fedora-package-review list being an appropriate way to tell everyone about package owner change requests either (a post to fedora-maintainers by a human involved would be much better), but that's not the point here, and I'm not expecting the CVS admin flags stuff to be a silver bullet to everything. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
