On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:59:24AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 14.02.2007 23:06, Brian Pepple wrote: > >/topic FESCO-Meeting -- Encourage co-maintainership -- all, thl > > FYI, I reworked the last proposal and some FESCo members looked over it > and seemed to agree with it so far, too. See > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/EncourageComaintainership > for details. Please comment. This seems good to me, although this is a bit long. I have one criticism, I think that for some packages co-maintainership is not needed and a loss of time. On maintainer for all the branches, including EPEL is not an issue for those packages. For examples in the packages I maintain there is asa which hasn't changed since 1994, or libsx - I don't even know if there are actual users for thoses packages. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
