On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:27:58PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Thats nice in theory, but in practice, standardizing on one piece of > infrastructure is often > the only way to get anything done. But in that case there is a risk for the design to be bad. Modularity should always be the easiest possible. > And users care a lot more about the > fact that the default > display manager works nicely than the fact that they can switch to 20 > different display > managers... Depends on the users. I am a power user and I care about being able to use the display manager, init, window manager, programming language, mailer I like more. Sure, it may be better for many users but I don't think locking stuff it is a good way to attract contributors. Providing alternatives has always been a good way to move along in fedora extras, hoping it'll still be true after the merge. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
