Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:58:29AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Because it doesn't make much sense ? If we ship 5 copies of a central
piece of infrastructure,
it means that any change to that infrastruture becomes 50 times harder...
In that case there is a flaw in the infrastructure design, like not
enough modularity or a missing API. Every piece of fedora should be
replaceable with something that implements the same interface to a
known protocol or something like that.
Thats nice in theory, but in practice, standardizing on one piece of
infrastructure is often
the only way to get anything done. And users care a lot more about the
fact that the default
display manager works nicely than the fact that they can switch to 20
different display
managers...
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
