On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:49 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 20:34 +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > Con: it makes [renumbering] Sources a pain, it's harder to use since you
> > have to remember numbers not filenames. This number/filename mapping
> > trick doesn't scale well as anybody who has maintained spec files with
> > more than a handful of patches knows.
> >
>
> I'm sorry but this is absolute hilarity. If you have to remember which
> %SOURCEN macro corresponds to which file, then just scroll up in your
> favorite editor to the part that lists each Source/Patch file. If these
> names aren't descriptive enough, then that's an issue you need to
> resolve by renaming to something more appropriate (for example,
> "fix-BZ123456-config-error.patch" is a lot nicer than
> "fix-stupid-bug.patch").
Indeed. By not using %{SOURCE} macros, you're setting yourself up for
pain. Whenever reasonable, use macros.
~spot
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
