Warren Togami wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
But I will always resist arbitrary changes which lack technical
justification (or are just plain undesirable); the fact that such
changes are proposed as part of the Review Process does not make them
sacrosanct.
Regarding RPM_SOURCE_DIR vs. SOURCEn, doesn't the latter make it simply
easier to read and maintain? The former requires you to have file names
written in two or more places.
Sure it isn't against the rules to use the former, but why not make it
cleaner and easier to read?
Maybe in packages with like two source files. In the gecko packages,
it's sort of a pain. I have always loathed the numbering myself in
these packages, not only for source files but also for patch files. I
suppose I hadn't realized there was an alternative else I'd have
probably switched a while ago.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
