Todd Zullinger wrote:
Denis Leroy wrote:
The package seems to deal with two different tarballs, and generate
libgpod (0.4.2) and compat-libgpod (0.3.2) from the same spec file.
This is somewhat unusual, should this get review approval ? I would
prefer if the package were split in two personally.
The compat-libgpod package is only generated for FC6 and isn't part of
the F7/devel branch. I did the review on the devel branch only, as it
seemed to me that the other branches weren't relevant for the purposes
of the merge. Is that not the case?
I was the one who submitted the changes to Alex for the compat-libgpod
package in the FC6 spec. I believe Alex suggested that since it was
going to be short-lived there wasn't too much reason to make it a
separate package. I'm not sure what the policy or standard practice
is regarding compat- packages. Pointers and examples would be
welcome, of course, even if it's not totally relevant in this case.
BTW, apologies for not adding a link to the bug in my previous post.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022
I'm sorry, yes i was looking at the fc-6 spec file. The devel spec file
looks much better. Review looks good to me.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
