>>>>> "TM" == Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> writes: TM> Ok, but what to do when the package maintainer states that he TM> would not change it? Talk to the co-maintainer, then the maintainer's sponsor and, if necessary, bring the issue before FESCo. (Note in this case that there seems to be no sponsor for the package's maintainer.) TM> So there is the question how to proceed when one discovers a TM> violation of the packaging guidelines and the maintainer does not TM> want to change it. Well, there are multiple issues here. Fortunately all of the core packages will all have to be reviewed before becoming part of Fedora 7, so these issues will get fixed one way or another. I suspect that qemu may have valid performance concerns that those who understand the issues will have to discuss. (The license bit is pretty simple; if it's in the upstream tarball then it must be in the package; there's no flexibility here.) Could you check back later in the week for the review ticket to be opened and then mention your open ticket in that bug? That way the reviewer is sure to see it. You can even join in the mass review if you like. - J< -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
