On Tuesday 30 January 2007 20:49, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "TM" == Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > TM> I filed a bug[1], what is the next step? > > Well, it's kind of obvious that the package maintainer should then > deal with the bug. Ok, but what to do when the package maintainer states that he would not change it? > Is there some question that you're trying to ask without actually > asking it? Or are you trying to bring up some issue without actually > stating what that issue is? I do not completly understand where there is a problem. Initially I asked the following, maybe it helps to read it again to understand my other questions: | > (although they can obviously be introduced after reviews too). | | What to do then? I once filled a bug about this for qemu and it was closed | with WONTFIX: | | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208026 So there is the question how to proceed when one discovers a violation of the packaging guidelines and the maintainer does not want to change it. And there is also a specific issue: qemu which does not honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, it (maybe) destroys debuginfo with "-fomit-frame-pointer" and it does not provide the upstream license (which I only mentioned in the bug report). Regards, Till -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
