Re: RFC: Mass Review Process with Flags?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MW" == Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MW> For instance none of the 4-5 I have glimpsed at have the
MW> recommended BuildRoot value,

Lack of the recommend buildroot value is not a blocker, unless the
buildroot is broken somehow.  For example, if it's not under /tmp or
doesn't include the package name.  I'm honestly not sure about whether
the version needs to be there.  The point is to make sure that someone
doing multiple rebuilds in parallel doesn't get hosed because the
packages try to write to the same place, or try to write somewhere the
user can't.  

There was some discussion on the fedora-packaging list some time ago;
perhaps the archives would be of help.

 - J<

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux