Re: Co-maintainersip policy for Fedora Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roozbeh Pournader (roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Exactly.
> 
> But a question. Will you need co-maintainers to be sponsored for
> co-maintenance? For example, may I (not a sponsor) get new people
> involved in Fedora by making them co-sponsors of my packages?

So, this is interesting from a logistics perspective; we would want
a way to allow ACLs for committing to the package they're co-maintaining,
without allowing them to commit to other packages that may be open.

That's not possible ATM with current code.

Bill

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux