Linus Walleij schrieb: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> E.g. a team of "packaging specialists" being granted "card blanche >> privileges" on "packaging issues" (...) >> At least to me, e.g. wrt. packaging, in obvious cases, this would spare >> me a lot of time, because bugzilla'ing takes much more time than >> directly fixing something. > You're right. And I notice that I also stated before that most of the > Fedora core people (loosely defined term but definately including Ralf) > are welcome to change and rebuild any of my packages at will. > > Actually the idea of strict ownership evades me, I would rather prefer a > more Wiki-like attitude (once you have a Fedora ID account and PGP key) - > "BE BOLD", "If in doubt, fix it". > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages +1 -- I'm all for that, too, but every time I proposed something like the above somewhere I got quickly shot down by other people. But the proper place for that IMHO is not the co-maintainers policy. It's IMHO the "when to touch other peoples packages" policy. When I wrote that I even tried to grant some "packaging specialists" access everywhere, but as I said: People did not like it and preferred the bugzilla way even for obvious fixes. Cu thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
