Re: Co-maintainersip policy for Fedora Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Also, we may want to have a HACKING file or something like that in the
> > CVS repository, instead of putting the info in the wiki.
> 
> Still unsure. I still prefer the wiki a bit over CVS. Other opinions? Or
> could we use the PackageDB for this sort of stuff, too?

In the package is easiest for obvious maintenance - packagedb probably
shouldn't be required to carry free-form information. Also, most
of the stuff should be obvious.

Bill

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux