Re: Co-maintainersip policy for Fedora Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:59 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Fedora Extras for a long time wanted to have more than one maintainer
> per package as that has several advantages (see below). But until now we
> never had a policy how it should look like and how it those maintainers
>  should work and interact. I took some time and wrote something up.
> Please comment!

I have a somewhat related question. Is there a way for a user to follow
all bugzilla traffic for a specific module. This is useful both in the
multiple maintainers case, but also in the current state where people
are helping out with specific modules. 

Right now the only way i know of is to follow all the maintainers
bugzilla mail and filter on the component in the mail header. This is
not particularly nice though...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a fiendish gay senator looking for 'the Big One.' She's a disco-crazy 
gypsy Valkyrie from a different time and place. They fight crime! 

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux