On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Tim Burke wrote: > > Also, with the brave new world of Core and Extras merged, is it just > > "anything in Fedora that's not in RHEL is fine for EPEL", or what? > > > > > Perhaps a small distinction, but I think the definition is a little broader.. > ie a little more than RHEL... extending to the layered products. > Specifically, I propose that EPEL is "FE stuff that RH doesn't otherwise ship > that someone volunteers to do the work in EPEL". That would preclude things > like our cluster and directory server packages from simply being rebuilt and > pushed in EPEL. But how would that work? There's soon no FE, just F. And, for example, directory server will likely be in F at some point.... later, chris -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
