On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:53:20PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 05:33 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > I think large parts of the review process could be automated or at > > the very least aided, so that reviewers have less trivial stuff to > > check and can be reviewing more effectively. [...] Perhaps the > > review process itself could use a helper [...] > I will repeat what I have said in the past: If someone writes a good, > easy to use, open source tool to check for Fedora Packaging Compliance > (tm), then I think we would consider having all new packages > automatically run through that tool before human-review. > Short answer: Show me the tool. :) Well, I do feel challenged and I hope to find some time early in the new year to work on such a tool. Speaking of which: Since it's around the corner prepare for a Happy New Year! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpeG2DVQxuc7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
