Re: Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 30 December 2006 10:52, Axel Thimm wrote:
> So for checking whether your single-worded "APPROVED" is correct or
> not the whole work needs to be repeated instead of checking that you
> reviewed the mandatory items. Sorry, but that's nowhere near quality
> control.

Just looking to see if the checklist was pasted isn't quality control either.  
The only way to _actually_ check that things were reviewed is to do the 
review yourself.  A spot check.  Anything less is trusting the reviewer did 
the right thing, and if you're already doing that, what does it matter if 
they just listed APPROVED or if they copy/pasted a long list of check items?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp2xxHoz6N6f.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux